|
|
Post by batman on Sept 18, 2007 12:53:03 GMT -5
Archetypes good or bad?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tomás Flannabhra on Sept 19, 2007 18:16:48 GMT -5
Bad, it disregards the individuality that is traditionally honored of each deity. |
|
|
|
Post by batman on Sept 19, 2007 18:28:00 GMT -5
Bad, it disregards the individuality that is traditionally honored of each deity. I tend to agree, since I look at old religion for their historical merit as opposed to their spiritual merit. It would be nice to see some opposing thought for discussions sake. A Wiccan, perhaps. |
|
|
|
Post by Tomás Flannabhra on Sept 19, 2007 18:32:09 GMT -5
Traditional Wiccans don't hold the belief of archetypes. They have a specific God and Goddess but they are only revealed upon initiation. NeoWicca is fond of the archetypes anf plain "culture raping". |
|
|
|
Post by batman on Sept 19, 2007 18:34:20 GMT -5
Traditional Wiccans don't hold the belief of archetypes. They have a specific God and Goddess but they are only revealed upon initiation. NeoWicca is fond of the archetypes anf plain "culture raping". I know a 3rd degree Alexandrian Priest who would disagree. |
|
|
|
Post by Tomás Flannabhra on Sept 19, 2007 18:38:52 GMT -5
I know a 3rd degree Alexandrian Priest who would disagree. You've got me interested now. ALL the BTWiccans I've conversed with, including Spunky, have said that archetypes play not part in their practice and that they have specific and defined deities. |
|
|
|
Post by batman on Sept 19, 2007 18:46:36 GMT -5
I know a 3rd degree Alexandrian Priest who would disagree. You've got me interested now. ALL the BTWiccans I've conversed with, including Spunky, have said that archetypes play not part in their practice and that they have specific and defined deities. Flegantis used to post and own the fluffs in R&P. He got busy with life, though. I am trying to see if he will spend some time here. Good brain to pick. |
|
